Title:______________________________________________________________________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||||
| CATEGORY |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Abstract |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Content |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Presentation Syle |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Figures/Tables |
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
| Overall |
|
|
|
|
|
COMMENTS:
1). Features of the presentation that were commendable:
2). Features that could be improved, and how:
ABSTRACT: Title is a good index to content, objective and clear to reader, methods briefly but sufficiently described, results and conclusions clearly stated, concise synopsis of presentation.
CONTENT: Objective or hypothesis clearly stated, methods described briefly but adequately, data sufficient and analysis appropriate, conclusions follow from results and were clearly summarized.
ORGANIZATION: Thesis well presented and argued logically, clear and reasonable progression of ideas.
PRESENTATION STYLE: Topics clear, good balance of illustrations and explanation, presenter knowledgeable and courteous.
FIGURES/ TABLES: Figures and tables clear and readable, not cluttered with unnecessary information, effective at quickly conveying a point, enhance and do not detract from presentation. Text and illustrations easy to read, effective use of color.
OVERALL: Presentation as a whole was effective, a truly professional contribution
[Adapted from the American Society of Mammalogists]